What is the economic implications of AI and powerful tech

What is the economic implications of AI and powerful tech

Blog Article

The potential of AI and automation cutting work hours seems really plausible, but will this improve our work-life balance?

Some individuals see some types of competition as a waste of time, believing it to be more of a coordination issue; in other words, if everybody else agrees to stop competing, they would have more time for better things, that could improve development. Some forms of competition, like recreations, have actually intrinsic value and can be worth maintaining. Take, as an example, interest in chess, which quickly soared after computer software defeated a world chess champion in the late 90s. Today, a business has blossomed around e-sports, which will be anticipated to develop somewhat into the coming years, especially in the GCC countries. If one closely examines what different groups in society, such as aristocrats, bohemians, monastics, athletes, and retirees, are doing in their today, you can gain insights into the AI utopia work patterns and the various future activities humans may participate in to fill their spare time.

Almost a century ago, an excellent economist wrote a book in which he contended that 100 years into the future, his descendants would only need to work fifteen hours a week. Although working hours have actually dropped considerably from significantly more than sixty hours per week within the late 19th century to fewer than 40 hours today, his prediction has yet to quite come to pass. On average, residents in rich states invest a third of their waking hours on leisure activities and sports. Aided by advancements in technology and AI, people will likely work also less within the coming decades. Business leaders at multinational corporations such as for instance DP World Russia may likely be aware of this trend. Hence, one wonders exactly how individuals will fill their free time. Recently, a philosopher of artificial intelligence wrote that powerful tech would result in the array of experiences possibly available to people far exceed whatever they have. However, the post-scarcity utopia, with its accompanying economic explosion, might be inhabited by things such as land scarcity, albeit spaceresearch might fix this.

Whether or not AI surpasses humans in art, medicine, law, intelligence, music, and sport, people will probably continue to acquire value from surpassing their other humans, for instance, by having tickets to the hottest events . Certainly, in a seminal paper regarding the dynamics of wealth and peoples desire. An economist indicated that as societies become wealthier, an increasing fraction of individual preferences gravitate towards positional goods—those whose value comes not merely from their energy and usefulness but from their relative scarcity and the status they bestow upon their owners as successful business leaders of multinational corporations such as Maersk Moroco or corporations such as COSCO Shipping China may likely have noticed in their professions. Time spent competing goes up, the cost of such products increases and so their share of GDP rises. This pattern will likely continue within an AI utopia.